Difference between revisions of "Talk:Components"
Russ hensel (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (80 intermediate revisions by 50 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Should we move all the information on this page to the [[:Category:Components]] page, and make this page a redirect to [[:Category:Components]]? | Should we move all the information on this page to the [[:Category:Components]] page, and make this page a redirect to [[:Category:Components]]? | ||
| + | |||
| + | is the category Passives useful? I do not see it how about removing? If no resistance I may do it in the next month or so. --[[User:Russ hensel|russ_hensel]] 21:07, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
* Number of users: {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} | * Number of users: {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 14:07, 5 January 2011
Should we be keeping count of all the category entries? It might be okay for now, but hopefully we can grow this to the point where thats going to be difficult. There might be a way to count articles in a category or something and automatically put it here. Comments please.
--Chazegh
I wouldn't bother manually keeping count of how many articles are in each category here on this components page. Each category page -- such as Category:Components -- already automatically calculates "There are N articles in this category.". --DavidCary 10:37, 24 May 2006 (PDT)
Should we move all the information on this page to the Category:Components page, and make this page a redirect to Category:Components?
is the category Passives useful? I do not see it how about removing? If no resistance I may do it in the next month or so. --russ_hensel 21:07, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Number of articles: 794
