Difference between revisions of "Talk:Basic Circuit Building Blocks"

From OpenCircuits
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(high side switch -- which kind?)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
If so, which kind is the best for the purposes of this page?
 
If so, which kind is the best for the purposes of this page?
 
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 20:06, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
 
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 20:06, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
 +
 +
 +
Russ says:  I wrote the original and did the schematic, I do not think the text indicates which type of transistor is used?  But that aside, I now realize that you are right that either type of transistor can be used.  With the one in the schematic you have positive logic in that a + input turns on the switch but requires a drive voltage higher than the power supply.  If the reverse polarity transistor is used then a low voltage on the input turns on the switch, this does not require that a voltage higher than the main powersupply be used.  With fets I think that the npn and pnp are not as symetrical in price and preformance as for bypolar transistors so the positive logic is the prefered approach with some high side switches incorporating their own charge pumps. Some of this should perhaps be noted on the page, but I would rather do it with external references as I would like to keep the circuits on the page nice and simple ( we could also have a follow up page on the wiki )  In any case I am not sure enough about all this stuff to document it without more research that I do not have time to do now ( lots of summer projects including getting ready for burning man, will any of our wiki members be there? ).  The upshot is that the item could be improved, but I am not up for it now.

Revision as of 08:59, 4 August 2008

Talk about basic circuits and BB

Got some ideas?


Hey, can you put the eagle cad schematic sources up? That way other folks can copy and paste for new circuits, or adapt the ones there (need a better meter symbol, for example).

This is russ_hensel who did a lot of this yet unfinished page. I will try to pull something together on the eagle files in the next few days and post it somewhere, but do not get too excited, I had to create some of the parts and I did just enough for the schematic, the internal details and footprints are typically junk.


Update The link is here. Formerly Missing Link


It occurs to me that the individual circuits should be broken out into seperate pages. This would make the whole thing a lot easier to work with. Wackyvorlon 23:20, 13 April 2008 (PDT)


high side switch

I find the high-side switch section (Basic Circuits and Circuit Building Blocks#Transistor High Side Switch) confusing. The text seems to describe a PNP high side switch (or perhaps a Pfet?), while the diagram shows a NPN high side switch.

I've seen PNPs on the high side in some circuits. I've also seen NPNs on the high side in other circuits.

Would mentioning both kinds on this page lead to unnecessary confusion? If so, which kind is the best for the purposes of this page? --DavidCary 20:06, 2 August 2008 (PDT)


Russ says: I wrote the original and did the schematic, I do not think the text indicates which type of transistor is used? But that aside, I now realize that you are right that either type of transistor can be used. With the one in the schematic you have positive logic in that a + input turns on the switch but requires a drive voltage higher than the power supply. If the reverse polarity transistor is used then a low voltage on the input turns on the switch, this does not require that a voltage higher than the main powersupply be used. With fets I think that the npn and pnp are not as symetrical in price and preformance as for bypolar transistors so the positive logic is the prefered approach with some high side switches incorporating their own charge pumps. Some of this should perhaps be noted on the page, but I would rather do it with external references as I would like to keep the circuits on the page nice and simple ( we could also have a follow up page on the wiki ) In any case I am not sure enough about all this stuff to document it without more research that I do not have time to do now ( lots of summer projects including getting ready for burning man, will any of our wiki members be there? ). The upshot is that the item could be improved, but I am not up for it now.