Editing PIC Programmers, In Circuit Programming and BootLoaders

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 61: Line 61:
  
 
* Do not need to remove chip from the PIC circuit.
 
* Do not need to remove chip from the PIC circuit.
 
Cypress says "ISSP ... stands for In-System-Serial-Programming.  We recommend that all PCBs be designed to support ISSP. During the prototyping phase it is very convenient for the hardware of software engineer to be able to re-program a PSoC device on the prototype board. This is much easier than removing the PSoC device, reprogramming it and replacing it on the PCB. This is especially true when using surface mount devices."
 
-- Cypress
 
[http://www.cypress.com/psoc2/?id=1353&rtID=118&rID=27453 "Programming a PSoC In System"]
 
 
[http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/DOC0943.PDF "Atmel AVR910: In-System Programming"]
 
 
 
  
 
Disadvantages
 
Disadvantages

Please note that all contributions to OpenCircuits may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see OpenCircuits:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: